Search results

Hmm. One last suggestion. As I mentioned much earlier in this thread, part of the problem is the lack of a clear definition of bullying. As we've seen here and in other threads, there's a very broad spectrum of definitions of the word among members of this site. As such, I'd recommend one of two...

The problem with taking criticism to email isn't a lack of response. The main issue is that once these things are taken from the public arena to the private, it's far too easy to shut them down. Like it or not, this has happened before - not to me personally, but I know for a fact that critical...

Again I ask, what do you mean? Can you point out some examples?

Apparently, pointing out specific mistakes is now the wrong way to express opinions? I honestly don't understand where you're coming from. There have been no personal attacks. No threats, insults or inappropriate posts. Hell, there hasn't even been any mild rudeness. As Jalen said, criticism...

Hmm. In order: 1. For starters, I would provide a definition of bullying and ask people to judge based on that. That wouldn't be enough, but it's a start. However, I was not the one who claimed that these numbers were supposed to be objective. 2. You most assuredly cannot tell me that I am...

I have a couple of problems with that. The first is that an anonymous survey regarding bullying, with no basic definition of the word to work with, does not even resemble "objective data". It is completely subjective. The second problem is that the survey was always going to suffer from at least...