Raam Sho'am
Gaidin
Hmm. In order:
1. For starters, I would provide a definition of bullying and ask people to judge based on that. That wouldn't be enough, but it's a start. However, I was not the one who claimed that these numbers were supposed to be objective.
2. You most assuredly cannot tell me that I am wrong. Just because you got a decent number of responses from people who did not feel bullied does not change the fact that those who DID feel bullied were far more likely to respond. There's a reason professional pollsters try their best to achieve random samples.
3 and 4. Then adjust the numbers accordingly. I want to know the percentages based on the number of people who actually answered a question. If someone does not participate in chat, it might be a bit difficult for that person to see bullying there.
5. First of all, I'll thank you to keep the condescension to yourself next time. Second, I do not have to be an expert statistician to recognize flawed methodology. This is akin to saying that since I've never served as president of the United States, I cannot criticize anything done by Barack Obama or George W. Bush.
1. For starters, I would provide a definition of bullying and ask people to judge based on that. That wouldn't be enough, but it's a start. However, I was not the one who claimed that these numbers were supposed to be objective.
2. You most assuredly cannot tell me that I am wrong. Just because you got a decent number of responses from people who did not feel bullied does not change the fact that those who DID feel bullied were far more likely to respond. There's a reason professional pollsters try their best to achieve random samples.
3 and 4. Then adjust the numbers accordingly. I want to know the percentages based on the number of people who actually answered a question. If someone does not participate in chat, it might be a bit difficult for that person to see bullying there.
5. First of all, I'll thank you to keep the condescension to yourself next time. Second, I do not have to be an expert statistician to recognize flawed methodology. This is akin to saying that since I've never served as president of the United States, I cannot criticize anything done by Barack Obama or George W. Bush.