Search results

Well to be fair, I DID say that the discussion was in the other thread, and this is not the place to have it again, and THAT'S why I didn't want to reopen it :P

Actually that happens here A LOT! ^^

Well see, this is EXACTLY what I didn't want to happen ^^ We already have an ending theories thread. I'll just say that you guys are wrong. Nothing you said was accurate, especially about Rand's fight with the DO, as I've brought many quotes from the book to show in the other thread. I also...

Well I'll start by saying the DO didn't "win," so much as he has managed to prevent his own loss. He is the father of lies. By convincing Rand that he is, in fact, required for the choice between good and evil, he is basically preventing his own death, thus insuring the continuation of the...

:P I need to read the comming encyclopedia with things from an out side view to be convinced :P Too many things about the ending simply don't make any sense.

Eluial - that makes no sense to me. For one thing, Rand wasn't infested with an evil inside that corrupted him, like Frodo was. We don't know if Harry COULDN'T kill Voldemort, just because Voldemort killed himself first. Rand was lied to by the DO. I believe he could and should have killed him...