Search results

  1. A

    Why Ishamael is wrong: The Nature of the Pattern and the Dark One

    Sorry for popping out of the discussion for a few days - I was very busy. So basically, we wait for the Encyclopedia?
  2. A

    Why Ishamael is wrong: The Nature of the Pattern and the Dark One

    You are saying that the DO experiences one event because the Bore occurs at one place. This equation is never expressly stated in the books. Second, that question I have asked previously. The only conclusion is that the LB goes different every time, unless BS will give us an answer in the future.
  3. A

    Why Ishamael is wrong: The Nature of the Pattern and the Dark One

    That is not backed up by anything from the books. While it is possible that this is the case, I see no fundamental evidence suggesting that the DO only has one experience rather than a succession of experiences, which by diction used in LoC seems to be the case.
  4. A

    Why Ishamael is wrong: The Nature of the Pattern and the Dark One

    I am not saying he did this, then left, then did it again. To him, he did it, was sealed off and immediately began doing it again. Time has proceeded forward for Randlanders, and it must also for the DO. However, as you pointed out, there is no time in between.
  5. A

    Why Ishamael is wrong: The Nature of the Pattern and the Dark One

    By this argument and summation, which I can accept, you must concede that, therefore, the DO is constantly going from battle to battle with 0 in-between time, rather than one singular battle.
  6. A

    Why Ishamael is wrong: The Nature of the Pattern and the Dark One

    But MuKen, he clearly remembers Rand. I don't have the book with me, but he says in the prologue of LoC, "done by my ancient enemy, the one called Dragon" or something of that nature. He has experienced Rand's presence before, has memory of him before, and so your theory falls apart. The DO...
Top