Sabriane Diamodred
Aes Sedai
I just have to say, that is extremely well-articulated. It captures the context of things, both the obvious bad (the act) and the greater good (the community).
Thanks Dars
I just have to say, that is extremely well-articulated. It captures the context of things, both the obvious bad (the act) and the greater good (the community).
I was arrested for a crime I didn't commit once. It was almost two years before the case against me was dropped. This was the brief explanation that my lawyer gave on why it was taking so long. Mine was a case of he said, she said on top of that. They knew the result of the crime, but couldn't pin down who committed it because of conflicting statements.
It also didn't help that my lawyer had a heart attack in the middle of all that time. >.<
And I still received consequences from it even though the case was dropped. I'm now not allowed to work with children, nor can I adopt.
I don't know that it's a both/and. From the IRS perspective, either you admit you got it illegitimately, in which case you are handled through the criminal justice system, or you insist you got it legitimately, in which case it's treated as regular income (baring something like a gift, and even that has limits) that you didn't report and on which you now owe penalties and back taxes. There's a piper to pay either way.
And I still received consequences from it even though the case was dropped. I'm now not allowed to work with children, nor can I adopt.
TV leadership voted unanimously to report Riley to local law enforcement in New Mexico and to the FBI on the basis of potential crimes such as theft, embezzlement, wire fraud, and ... a matter recently opened by the IRS ... addressing Riley's believed failure to report as income the money misappropriated from TV's accounts.
I don't know that it's a both/and. From the IRS perspective, either you admit you got it illegitimately, in which case you are handled through the criminal justice system, or you insist you got it legitimately, in which case it's treated as regular income (baring something like a gift, and even that has limits) that you didn't report and on which you now owe penalties and back taxes. There's a piper to pay either way.
I bow to your experience on this point :bowYour claim being legal or not, matters not, you got income you report it period. That is what the IRS expects. Income includes if you exchange work for chickens man... You gotta claim that chicken (and yes I'm serious you must get the average value of a chicken and count it as income.) This includes gifts from family (although most people don't really count those but if they are in big enough amounts they need to be). There is a difference between earned income and unearned and how it's taxed.. so that is the only part they make a difference in.. stolen money, money earned from drug sales or other illegal activities.. report it and you won't get busted for tax evasion even if busted for other crimes.
Thanks for the update.
Is there a reason that Tarvalon.net isn't sharing the actual amount of money that was stolen? It seems very vague every time it's brought up and I feel like I've heard more certain numbers whispered about at events than I have in any official thread. Just curious why the number hasn't been revealed. Like I get that it may be more, and we'll never know if Riley hasn't divulged, but just based on research alone, how much are we reporting to the authorities was taken?
I assume if there are charges filed and a court case, we will be told (as it will be in the newspapers, so there shouldn't be any legal reasons for secrecy). Once the investigations have been finished and the legal authorities have made a decision, will be be told whatever that is?
Also forgive me for being slow but how has it taken two years for ...... This? Is there a rough time scale until Riley gate is finished with?
Hammer, could you tell us what the law in these jurisdictions sets out as punishment for these crimes? In general, I mean, not as a promise or prediction of what will happen in this particular case.
For those of you breathlessly rushing back from the Googles, yes, that does mean the value in question is over 20K.
One of the problems is that Riley not only had access to the money, he had access to the records. While we therefore have a minimum number that we are confident was taken, we do not yet know (until all the investigations are finished) if even more was taken. For us to say a number could reveal to him what we haven't discovered. We definitely have conveyed that number to law enforcement and the IRS, even though it is not public knowledge.
It's like a parent saying "I am mad that you were out an hour after curfew!" when you know you were out till 5AM.